Claude Code vs Cline: Which AI Coding Agent Is Better for You?
Cline is one of the most popular open-source coding agents. It runs in VS Code, JetBrains, the terminal and a desktop app, and it isn't tied to one AI provider. Claude Code is Anthropic's own agent, built around Claude models.
Both plan, edit files and run commands with your approval. The real differences are model choice, cost model and how you customise them.
Quick verdict
Choose Cline if you want open source and the freedom to use any model provider, including local models. Choose Claude Code if you want Anthropic's first-party agent, a flat subscription option and the richest set of customisation layers.
Choose Cline if…
- You want an open-source agent (Apache-2.0)
- You want to switch between providers, or run local models
- You want a VS Code extension with explicit Plan and Act modes
- You are happy to pay your model provider directly
Choose Claude Code if…
- You mainly use Claude models
- You'd rather pay a flat monthly plan than per token
- You want subagents, skills, slash commands and hooks
- You want a first-party tool built alongside the models
Side-by-side comparison
| Cline | Claude Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Made by | Cline Bot Inc. (open-source project) | Anthropic |
| Open source | Yes, Apache-2.0 (JetBrains plugin not open-sourced) | No |
| Where it runs | VS Code, JetBrains, terminal, desktop app, SDK | Terminal, VS Code, JetBrains, desktop app, web |
| Models | Many providers (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, OpenRouter, local) | Anthropic's Claude models |
| Paying for models | Through the provider you connect | Claude plan (Pro, Max, Ultra, Team) or API key |
| Project rules | .clinerules files | CLAUDE.md |
| Extensibility | Rules, skills, MCP | Subagents, skills, slash commands, hooks, MCP |
How Cline works
Cline's signature feature is its Plan and Act toggle. In Plan mode it explores your codebase and proposes a strategy; in Act mode it carries the plan out, asking for approval before editing files or running commands unless you enable auto-approve. Project rules live in .clinerules files, and skills let it load specific rules when needed. It also connects to MCP servers.
Because Cline isn't locked to one provider, you can point it at Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, OpenRouter or a local model, and switch per task.
How Claude Code differs
Claude Code is built by the same company that makes the Claude models, and it is designed around them. It plans and executes tasks across your project and adds layers Cline doesn't emphasise: subagents that each run in their own context window with their own tool limits, custom slash commands and hooks that run scripts automatically around tool use.
Cost: pay per token vs flat plan
With Cline you typically pay your model provider for what you use, which is great for light use and full control, but costs can climb on heavy days. Claude Code can run on an API key the same way, or on a Claude subscription — Pro at $20/month ($17 billed annually), Max at $100 or Ultra at $200 — which many developers find easier to budget for.
The bottom line
If open source and model freedom matter most, Cline is excellent. If you're committed to Claude and want the deepest customisation, Claude Code is the better fit — and claudeagents gives you 120+ ready-made subagents, 54 skills and 54 slash commands to build on.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cline free?
Cline itself is open source under Apache-2.0. You pay for the AI model you connect it to, unless you run a local model.
Can Cline use Claude models?
Yes. Anthropic is one of the providers Cline supports, along with OpenAI, Google, OpenRouter and local options.
What is the Claude Code equivalent of .clinerules?
CLAUDE.md. Both hold project-specific instructions the agent reads automatically.
Does Claude Code have a Plan mode like Cline?
Yes. Claude Code has a plan mode where it researches and proposes an approach before making changes.
Get 120+ agents for Claude Code
Coding, SEO and marketing kits, 54 skills and 54 slash commands. $49 one-time, lifetime updates.
See what's included →